• About
  • Contact Me
  • Archive

OurCity.London

Investigative journalism into the town planning and development industries

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Financial Viability
  • Photography
  • Write for OurCity.London
  • May 16, 2022
You are here: Home / Planning Issues / Regeneration / Can estate regeneration meet London’s housing need?

Can estate regeneration meet London’s housing need?

January 6, 2017 By George Turner 3 Comments

Ethelred Estate
The Ethelred Estate in South London. A high density estate of mid-rise buildings. The estate has several towers which are out of view

Why are London’s politicians so keen to knock down council estates?

Lib Peck, the leader of Lambeth Council, who is pushing through estate demolitions against fierce opposition from residents, feels that estate regeneration is essential to build extra homes, which are badly needed in London. She has described estate regeneration as

a golden opportunity to act in the face of the crisis

Many other council leaders in London appear to think the same. 

But how essential is the kind of estate regeneration being practiced?

Much of the excitement has been generated by reports that have claimed that there is a huge potential to increase housing numbers on council estates. 

Developers, seeing an opportunity to generate huge profits from large scale redevelopment programmes, have been particularly keen to press the case. In January 2016, Savills published a research paper suggesting that up to 360,000 new homes could be built by densifying London’s local authority owned housing estates. 

Another report, published by Centre for London, and sponsored by Countryside Properties (Countryside, despite the name, are heavily involved in estate regeneration), estimated that up to 160,000 homes could be delivered.

Wild exaggerations 

However, scratch beneath the surface of the Centre for London report and the numbers are wildly unreliable. As the authors explain, their model was based on a sample of large council estates in four London boroughs: Lewisham, Barking and Dagenham, Hounslow and Waltham Forest. They claim that they wanted a mix of inner and outer London boroughs. In reality only Lewisham can be considered to be in inner London, and only barely so. 

They then look at the densities of the the estates in these areas, and calculate how many more homes could be accommodated if they were rebuilt to the maximum densities recommended in the London plan for Central London. These figures are then scaled up to create a London-wide figure.

The problems with this approach are obvious to anyone with a basic knowledge of London and a GCSE in maths. 

Firstly, because the sample is heavily weighted in favour of outer London, the existing housing estates included in the study will be of relatively low density, and so naturally will have a greater potential to increase density.

The study assumes that inner London estates have the same potential to increase housing density than the outer London estates included in their study.  

Given that their analysis is based on bringing densities up to inner london levels, this is an absurd proposition. 

It should be obvious that there is much less potential to increase the density of central London, when your target is the recommended density for central london. The reality is that much of central London is already at or above the density guidelines.

To give a concrete example, the recommended housing density for a Central London area with very good public transport is 175-355 units per hectare. ‘Urban’ areas have a recommended density of 80-210 units per hectare. The Ethelred Estate, which is one of the largest housing estates in London, is located just a mile or so from the Houses of Parliament. It is just outside the central area, in an area classed as ‘urban’ London in the London Plan. The estate has an existing density of 231 u/ha, which is currently being increased with an infill development to 333 u/ha. Clearly there would be little point knocking down this estate to rebuild it to a marginally higher density, but the Centre for London study assumes all estates have a significant potential to increase their density.

The fact is that the figures compiled by the Centre for London will be a massive overstatement of the potential that estate regeneration has to contribute to meeting London’s housing need.

And the Centre for London’s figures are considered by many to be conservative. One wonders where on earth Savills’ figures come from.

To be fair to the authors, they do admit that their numbers are, to say the least, problematic, but such detail is always missed by journalists and politicians, like Dave Hill of the Guardian, who will quote the headlines.  

This has clear implications for policy makers. If the reports on estate regeneration grossly overstate the contribution that estate regeneration can make to  housing supply in the capital, should councils be pursuing the policy so vigorously? Perhaps we would all be better served if planning authorities focused their energy on other, more effective, ideas to improve housing supply. 

Filed Under: Regeneration Tagged With: centre for london, Estate Regeneration, ethelred estate, Savills

Comments

  1. Roy Wenborne says

    January 8, 2017 at 11:08 am

    Of course this is nonsense. It’s about getting out working class tenants and substituting with those who can afford high rents or purchase flats at high prices.

    Reply
  2. mattf says

    January 9, 2017 at 3:59 pm

    http://g15london.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/G15-Meeting-Regen-Challenges.pdf

    This is the g15’s lobbying effort. They are also pushing for higher density. Some interesting insight in to the numbers too. Doesn’t actually deliver that many new homes between now and 2040 — just 14,000 in London.

    Reply

Comment Policy: I would dearly love to hear your thoughts. However I ask that you please only use your real name and keep your comments focused on the issues raised by this article. If you want to contact me privately you can do so by sending me a message directly. My contact details are included on this site. Spam, or abusive comments will be deleted

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

What we are writing about

Investigative journalism telling the real story of contemporary London. In particular we are interested in:

Planning, development and affordable housing

Estate Regeneration and compulsory purchase

Bad practice and fraud in the property and development industry

But any stories which give an insight into how the economy and places of London are changing are welcome. If you have a story you are interested in please connect with us using the buttons below.

About Me

George TurnerGeorge Turner - an investigative journalist digging the dirt on London's property and development industry Read More

Archives

  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015

Recent Comments

  • John on Lockdown Landlords Acquitted
  • Concerned Citizens (@dequacivis) on The Battersea Power Station affordable housing scandal: How Wandsworth Gave away over 1000 affordable homes to a failing developer
  • HCLG Report Highlights ‘Lockdown’ as a significant problem – Hanworth.org on Lockdown landlord convicted for breaches in Planning Act
  • Hussain on The Housing Crisis
  • Ben Jamin' on The Housing Crisis

Tags

8 Albert Embankment Affordable Housing BNP Paribas Camden Canary Wharf Canary Wharf Group Canon A1 caroline pidgeon Compulsory Purchase Daylight DCLG Development development professionals Estate Regeneration Foreign Ownership GLA Planning Committee Heygate Isle of Dogs King's College Knight Frank Lambeth LFEPA Mayor of London Neighbourhood planning Offshore Planning Protest Quod RIBA RICS RTPI Sadiq Khan Savills Shell Shell Centre sian berry South Bank Spinwatch Sue Foster surveyors Viability Viability Consultants Wandsworth Westminster Wood Wharf

Recent Comments

  • John on Lockdown Landlords Acquitted
  • Concerned Citizens (@dequacivis) on The Battersea Power Station affordable housing scandal: How Wandsworth Gave away over 1000 affordable homes to a failing developer
  • HCLG Report Highlights ‘Lockdown’ as a significant problem – Hanworth.org on Lockdown landlord convicted for breaches in Planning Act
  • Hussain on The Housing Crisis
  • Ben Jamin' on The Housing Crisis

Newsletter

Subscribe to my newsletter

Never miss a story. I will never pass on your details and will email you no more than once a week.

Please wait...

Thank you for subscribing

Copyright © 2022 George Turner · Website powered by WordPress using the Genesis Framework · Log in