• About
  • Contact Me
  • Archive

OurCity.London

Investigative journalism into the town planning and development industries

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Financial Viability
  • Photography
  • Write for OurCity.London
  • May 16, 2022
You are here: Home / Facilitators / BNP Paribas Real Estate – Marketing tax avoidance to offshore investors

BNP Paribas Real Estate – Marketing tax avoidance to offshore investors

January 26, 2017 By George Turner 6 Comments

BNP Paribas Real Estate, one of the country’s leading firms of property consultants, and a major contractor to local government in London, has published a marketing brochure demonstrating to potential investors in London property how they can avoid taxes. Should local authorities continue to do business with this company?

Who are BNP Paribas?

The HQ of BNP Paribas Real Estate on Wood Street

BNP Paribas Real Estate is a firm of property consultants. They advise property developers and local councils on development. Their current chairman is Stephen Norris, who was a former Conservative mayoral candidate.  

On the local authority side they are one of the biggest firms advising on development viability. BNP Paribas Real Estate is contracted by councils to examine the development viability studies submitted by developers when they wish to remove affordable housing from a development. The company advises local councils on whether or not they should accept a loss of affordable housing. Almost always they agree with the developers that the local authority’s policy on affordable housing is unachievable, leading to a loss of affordable housing.

In a previous article on this site we revealed how BNP Paribas were sometimes paid by developers to carry out their local authority work, leading to real concerns over conflicts of interest. 

 

The tax avoidance scheme

How to avoid tax in London
From BNP Paribas “Investing in London Guide” in association with Nabarro

Of course, BNP Paribas Real Estate also advises private clients. As part of the marketing effort the company publishes an “Investing in London” guide, which they describe as follows: 

“Our Investing in London guide aims to help overseas investors understand the London market and what changes may be in store going forwards. Throughout this document, our experts will guide you through the different makeup of the London submarkets, all you need to know about London, examples of transactional deals we have done with overseas investors, and of course, where the next opportunities are coming from.” [emphasis added]

In one part of the guide, written by Kirsten Pritchard Jones of Nabarro, a law firm, there is a demonstration of how a potential investor can avoid taxes on their investment in commercial real estate.

In the BNP Paribas brochure Kirsten takes potential investors through a case study involving the purchase of a “trophy office property in Central London” by a Singaporean investor (S PLC). Kirsten recommends using a Jersey based holding company for the transaction (J CO).

This means that in the future the Jersey company owning the building can be sold instead of the building itself, avoiding stamp duty land tax on the transaction. A substantial saving, in this case £4m. In addition, if the Singaporean owner loans the money to the Jersey company to buy the offices, then rental income can be offset against interest payments, resulting in further savings. Further tax can be avoided if rental income is taken out of the country as management fees. As Kirsten says, “The net effect is that J Co should be subject to a very low effective rate of UK tax. ” 

Once the money is in Jersey, Kirsten explains:

“J Co is not subject to tax in Jersey on the rental income from London Building. Payments of dividends and interest are not subject to withholding tax. S Plc picked Jersey for these features, however, similar results can also be achieved with other jurisdictions.”

Kirsten has now moved to Macfarlanes, where she advises a number of clients, including Lend Lease and the Church of England on tax and real estate. God only knows what she tells them.

Cash strapped councils

At a time when governments are being starved of cash through cuts in their grant from central government, this raises real questions as to why local authorities spend money procuring services from BNP Paribas Real Estate; an organisation that works with lawyers to help their clients to avoid paying the very taxes that fund them.  

Joel Benjamin, founder of Community Reinvest, a community interest company that helps local authority pension funds move to more sustainable investments told us: 

“Local authorities, which rely on tax funded grants from central government for 75% of their income have no business doing deals with tax dodging multinationals, let alone companies like BNP and Nabarro which enable foreign property speculators to gamble tax free on “trophy properties” in the London housing market.
Perhaps local authorities simply did not know what their friends at BNP were up to. But even so, BNP could hardly be described as having an exemplary reputation when it comes to corporate ethics. BNP Paribas Real Estate see one of their key advantages as being part of the BNP Paribas group, one of the largest banks in the world. It describes this relationship as a “unique selling point”.
 
In 2014 the bank signed a deferred prosecution agreement with the United States Government where it admitted to willfully and knowingly laundering over $8bn. The bank was systematically removing information from financial transactions originating from Iran, Sudan and Cuba in order to help their clients evade US sanctions. As a result of the scandal the bank was fined $9bn by the US government for their crime. It was the largest ever fine imposed by the United States government for a criminal offence. 
 
 
Sure, the people in the money laundering department of BNP were not the same people employed by the company to advise local councils, but what does this say about the culture of the organisation?
 
We contacted BNP Paribas Real Estate about their Investing in London Guide, asking whether it was appropriate for a significant contractor to local government to be marketing tax avoidance services to their potential clients. They saw the story as a non issue, telling ourcity.london that the company had been open about the services it provides for some time. A spokesperson for BNP Paribas Real Estate told us: 

“The Investing in London Guide is a marketing brochure that has been freely and publicly available on our website for several years. It provides a factual overview of the features of the London real estate market and does not constitute legal or professional advice.”

Well reader – what do you think?

Filed Under: Facilitators Tagged With: BNP Paribas, Commercial property, Foreign Ownership, Nabarro, Offshore, Tax Avoidance

Comments

  1. Michael Edwards says

    January 27, 2017 at 5:16 am

    I share your outrage George and value the light you shine into dark corners. But I’m sure such behaviour is totally ‘normal’ among London ‘professionals’. Tax systems are designed in the knowledge that clever ppl will try to minimise their liability in this kind of way. Shaming them may be part to a campaign to change things but surely tougher laws (e.g. on overseas jurisdictions) are the main power we have.

    Reply
    • George TurnerGeorge Turner says

      January 30, 2017 at 8:38 am

      Yes! I have been told that the transaction outlined is completely normal and HMRC has no problem with it. That is the problem and I would think there would be a lot of schemes that could be killed quickly if HMRC gave some advice to Parliament on how to change the law to deal with them, rather than just produce report after report telling the world how well they are doing.

      Reply
  2. John C (@Juan_Zero1010) says

    January 29, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    Your reporting on developmental viability studies and their damaging impact on the creation of affordable housing is raising some important questions which deserve widespread attention and debate. However, like the commenter before me, I also feel that the issue of tax avoidance is a bit of a red herring. Local authorities are indeed constrained by the cuts in government grants to them, but it is not true to say that the government grant is ‘tax-funded’ – this is conventional short-hand, which unfortunately has come to be used as a means of justifying austerity without further discussion. Government does not literally spend the money it collects in taxes. Taxes are a necessary part of macroeconomic regulation, but the government is in no way limited in its spending by the amount of taxes it collects and should not use its deficit as a simple, undebatable, technocratic excuse to curtail the supply of affordable housing. (By the way, the government deficit is twice what was pledged, but I have not noticed a corresponding rise in inflation or storm of bond vigilantes). Off-shore ownership distorts the London property market and creates a haven for money-laundering (and these allegations should be the subject of market study and attention) but I don’t think this needs to be settled in order to address the shortage of affordable housing. I am very troubled by the lack of transparency of these viability studies and fear they are subverting well-intended efforts, or worse, diverting effort from other potentially better schemes.

    Reply
    • George TurnerGeorge Turner says

      January 30, 2017 at 8:35 am

      Thanks for the comment John. I see what you are saying, but I don’t agree that tax avoidance is a red herring. Debt can’t solve everything and at some point people need to pay taxes. If large property investors get away with avoiding their obligations that means more of the burden falls on the rest of us. How much extra you spend on top of the taxes collected (through borrowing) is a different question

      Reply

Comment Policy: I would dearly love to hear your thoughts. However I ask that you please only use your real name and keep your comments focused on the issues raised by this article. If you want to contact me privately you can do so by sending me a message directly. My contact details are included on this site. Spam, or abusive comments will be deleted

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

What we are writing about

Investigative journalism telling the real story of contemporary London. In particular we are interested in:

Planning, development and affordable housing

Estate Regeneration and compulsory purchase

Bad practice and fraud in the property and development industry

But any stories which give an insight into how the economy and places of London are changing are welcome. If you have a story you are interested in please connect with us using the buttons below.

About Me

George TurnerGeorge Turner - an investigative journalist digging the dirt on London's property and development industry Read More

Archives

  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015

Recent Comments

  • John on Lockdown Landlords Acquitted
  • Concerned Citizens (@dequacivis) on The Battersea Power Station affordable housing scandal: How Wandsworth Gave away over 1000 affordable homes to a failing developer
  • HCLG Report Highlights ‘Lockdown’ as a significant problem – Hanworth.org on Lockdown landlord convicted for breaches in Planning Act
  • Hussain on The Housing Crisis
  • Ben Jamin' on The Housing Crisis

Tags

8 Albert Embankment Affordable Housing BNP Paribas Camden Canary Wharf Canary Wharf Group Canon A1 caroline pidgeon Compulsory Purchase Daylight DCLG Development development professionals Estate Regeneration Foreign Ownership GLA Planning Committee Heygate Isle of Dogs King's College Knight Frank Lambeth LFEPA Mayor of London Neighbourhood planning Offshore Planning Protest Quod RIBA RICS RTPI Sadiq Khan Savills Shell Shell Centre sian berry South Bank Spinwatch Sue Foster surveyors Viability Viability Consultants Wandsworth Westminster Wood Wharf

Recent Comments

  • John on Lockdown Landlords Acquitted
  • Concerned Citizens (@dequacivis) on The Battersea Power Station affordable housing scandal: How Wandsworth Gave away over 1000 affordable homes to a failing developer
  • HCLG Report Highlights ‘Lockdown’ as a significant problem – Hanworth.org on Lockdown landlord convicted for breaches in Planning Act
  • Hussain on The Housing Crisis
  • Ben Jamin' on The Housing Crisis

Newsletter

Subscribe to my newsletter

Never miss a story. I will never pass on your details and will email you no more than once a week.

Please wait...

Thank you for subscribing

Copyright © 2022 George Turner · Website powered by WordPress using the Genesis Framework · Log in